Skip to main content

Headless apex court

The Himalayan Times
21 April 2023

Headless apex court

TheSupreme Court (SC) has been headless for the last fourteen months following the suspension of Chief Justice (CJ) Cholendra Shumsher Rana. None of the responsible authority seemed to be in a hurry to fill the vacant chair. As per Article 284 (3) of the constitution, the Constitutional Council (CC) should recommend a new CJ a month before the incumbent is to retire. Owing to the November elections, this provision could not be moved forward in the absence of crucial council members including Speaker, Deputy Speaker and leader of the opposition. The CC is now complete; there does not seem any reason why it should not be showing any interest towards recommending a new CJ. Could it be that the senior political leaders were not keen to fill the CJ’s chair for their vested political interests in the judiciary system? 

The SC, as the supreme arbitrator of the constitution and a major state organ, should not be allowed to remain headless for a long time due to unethical and self-centred political interests of some irresponsible political leaders. The SC had become a battleground after its sitting judges, some former CJs, justices and advocates protested demanding CJ Rana’s resignation, accusing him of colluding with the political parties to secure ministerial berths for his relatives. It is also an open secret that judicial independence has remained questionable in the recent years owing to increased politicisation in the judges’ appointment procedures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Political surprises of Balen led government

Prime Minister Balen Shah’s government has broken from decades of entrenched patronage politics  in its 100 days as called " honeymoon period ". Marked by rapid shifts, sweeping administrative overhauls, and bold foreign policy maneuvers, his tenure has generated several defining political surprises. Sweeping Governance & Administration Overhauls: A New Cabinet Standard : His government bypassed traditional veteran politicians, forming a 15-member cabinet that made national headlines for exclusively consisting of highly educated professionals. Dismantling Party Unions: In his first cabinet meeting, he shocked the civil service by pushing to abolish party-affiliated trade unions and aggressively streamlining federal ministries from 25 down to 17. The " 100-Point Agenda " : His governemnt immediately published a strict, delivery-focused 100-point reform agenda with measurable deadlines, aiming to completely digitize office management and track adminis...

The Fragile Majority of Balen Shah’s Government

Whether the Balendra "Balen" Shah -led government will complete its full five-year term seems mathematically and politically viable but remains uncertain. His Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) holds a strong majority with 182 out of 275 seats in the House of Representatives (HOR). This gives his government a strong political holding and leads the country with a comfortable majority to fulfil its objectives and mission. However, the smooth administration and timely and successful implementation of development activities as desired by his government depends totally on the traditional bureaucratic system which could threaten its stability and political uncertainty. Key Factors Threatening Longevity Internal Party Dissent: It recently completed 100 days its term, several ruling party lawmakers began publicly criticizing Prime Minister Shah's rigid leadership style and the government's policy execution. Institutional Resistance: The administration's sweeping 100-...

Strong government weak opposition

In the general elections held on March 5, 2026 the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) won overwhelmingly 182 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives (HOR). Accordingly, a new majority government was formed under the leadership of RSP senior leader Balendra (Balen) Shah , without the support of any political party.    The RSP enjoys a comfortable majority government, whereas the oppositions are in weak positions in the national political history. The Nepali Congress (NC) has been reduced to a mere 38 seats. The CPN-UML holds 25, the Nepali Communist Party (NCP) 17, the Shram Sanskriti Party (SSP) 7, and the Rastriya Prajatantra Party (RPP) just 5. No other party managed to get even 10 percent of the total seats other than the NC. When the opposition is significantly weaker than a strong ruling party, the foundational checks and balances of a democratic system might be significantly weakened or break down. This has raised a fundamental question for the democratic republic ...